Also, you seem to agree with me but you say you do not, which is odd. You say you need to moderate Competition, I agree, and I think it should be done by rules.
Another thing about the primacy of rules is that I’m sick of games who are “Competitive”, like old-skool D&D. The mechanics don’t support competition but it was acted as if it were, which created much hang-ups.

I don’t think Story needs to be creative, but I think it’s a shared goal of anyone to have a good story. For an example of “Competitive” Story look at Capes, but then you have Competitive mechanics which define who can set the Story, yet, you all want a cool story.
Rather incoherent, but that’s where I got thus far.

You forgot Game. It’s not “CSI” but “CSI Game”. Also, to be exact, I never mention “RPGs”, so when someone told me there is no Role-play opportunities in Cranium Rats I accepted and told him I don’t care about it!

Also, I believe primacy of rules everywhere. Interaction and Story also need to be set down in rules. I grow sick and tired of games that rely on Consensus and Sociality for you to do what they should be doing. The game doesn’t do these things, the group does.

Last, I don’t deal with “How” exactly, I post little ideas and thought-teasers. I make you think about Constraints, I make you think about your social contract, I give you small tidbits, but you can’t really “Define” how-to-do Competitive games, since the possibilities are endless.
I merely point out some points they share and why(Gm-less/GM-full, Scene Setting with Flags, etc.)